Marketing Measurement · Marketing measurement

Measure customer response, not channel performance

In short Marketing measurement should shift from asking which channel worked to asking how combined investments produced the customer responses that drove business outcomes.

The MediaPost article "Dumbest Fight in Marketing: Brand versus Performance" by Michael Farasciano is exactly the kind of article our industry needs:

https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/416645/dumbest-fight-in-marketing-brand-vs-performance.html

I'll be daring and take his provocative title one step further: The dumbest fight in marketing is deeper than "Brand versus Performance" ... it is "Investments versus Customers".

For decades we've organized our measurement around channels, campaigns, agencies, budgets, and the now decried ROAS. AI can optimize every one of those. Customers don't care.

They experience the overall brand, make a buying decision, and respond to every investment we make along their decision journey.

That's why at Provalytics we've built Agile Insights Modeling (AIM) around a different question.

We need to migrate the conversation from which channel worked?" to "how did our multiple investments create the multiple customer responses that ultimately produced the desired business outcomes?".

  • Advertising the brand may build mental availability
  • Distribution may assure physical availability
  • Retail media may improve "findability"
  • Performance based promotions may trigger urgency
  • Pricing may change affordability

However, none of these work in isolation.

They all interact to influence the different customer conversions on the journey and those interactions are what creates immediate incrementality as well as longer-term organic growth.

AI is potentially making this shift even more important.

The biggest opportunity isn't using AI to optimize media faster. It's using AI to understand how customers respond across an entire decision journey so every investment can be optimized as part of one connected system.

That's the difference between optimizing marketing and optimizing enterprise performance.

Excellent perspective, Michael! I believe the next evolution isn't ending the brand versus performance debate.

It's replacing it with a customer response system that measures growth the way customers actually experience it.

The future won't be won by optimizing channels against a single outcome.

It will be won by understanding those many different points of engagement we can share with customers and maximizing the probability of conversion to the next stage.

Cheers

Todd

Originally posted on LinkedIn →

Topics Marketing measurement · Brand versus performance · Artificial intelligence · Customer journey

Todd Kirk

About the author

Todd Kirk

Founder of Middlegame Marketing Sciences, turning marketing data into action

Todd Kirk is Founder and Managing Director of Middlegame Marketing Sciences, where the focus is helping organizations move beyond retrospective reporting to forward-looking growth. Todd has led the development of multi-million dollar analytical solutions at IRI and MMA, and is Co-Founder and Lead Architect at Provalytics. Todd received the ANA Genius Award for Marketing Analytics Innovation.

More from Todd →

Work with Todd

Send a message through the Index. Todd replies directly.

Your message is emailed to Todd. We don't share your address with anyone else.